FL Review Online

General Board of Global Ministries

UM Information

UM Reporter

Florida Southern College


Bethune
Cookman College


FL UM Children's Home




  

August 30, 2002

Edition

Clergy appreciate care amidst ministry struggles, stress

By Trudy Rankin

LAKELAND — The Florida Conference’s clergy believe they and their families are well cared for by the Florida Conference, according to a recent survey of 286 clergy and spouses by Healing House task force. That care comes amid concerns about the stress of ministry, issues related to parsonages and the itinerant system and a desire for more support in dealing with those issues.

The survey was part of the Healing House task force’s program of evaluating the care currently provided for clergy and their families. Most of the clergy responded to a survey on the Florida Conference’s Web site. A random telephone sampling of clergy added an additional 19 responses.

Melba Whitaker developed the idea for the Healing House ministry and is spearheading the effort. Whitaker is the wife of Florida Conference Bishop Timothy W. Whitaker.

Information from the survey will be used to form recommendations to the Annual Conference for new ways to care for the appointed leaders of the Florida Conference’s 744 churches and missions. One recommendation is to create a coordinating council that will oversee the provisions for clergy and clergy families, avoid duplication of efforts, provide resources not being offered, and conduct additional research into new and innovative resources for clergy families.

The survey asked clergy and their spouses to evaluate 10 activities that provide professional, spiritual and physical support and training to clergy families, including the Conference Counseling Network, Minister’s Mates Retreat, School of Ministry, Five Day Academy for Spiritual Formation, Annual Conference Day Care and the Campamento de Familias (Family Camp). Each survey gave participants the opportunity to provide comments.

One clergy commented positively on the variety of resources. “The different activities offered are wonderful,” he said. “Keep them going.”

Statistically, however, some activities have low participation compared to the total number of clergy in the conference. Some clergy said they have difficulty with the cost of events. Others said they were not able to attend because of their spouse’s job situation.

The Clergy Kids Retreat, one of the newest activities for clergy families, received the highest ratings; however, clergy were not as satisfied with some of the conference’s other provisions for children. Holding the Annual Conference Events at the Lakeland Civic Center has made parents more comfortable taking children there, but clergy were concerned about the Life Enrichment Center in Leesburg. “I wish that there were better child-care facilities at the LEC,” one said.

Many of the comments dealt with personal situations in ministry and showed both the strengths and weaknesses of the conference’s care for clergy.

Many clergy said they appreciated the camaraderie among peers. “Our best friends are those that are clergy families—they know what it’s about,” one wrote. Clergy also said they appreciate those in leadership, especially district superintendents and their spouses.

The areas of most concern among clergy related to dealing with stress, living in a parsonage and coping with the itinerancy.

Clergy asked for help preventing burnout, following a balanced lifestyle and finding opportunities to rest. “We need to hear from the bishop and district superintendents to take time off,” one said.

Getting that rest is difficult, and at least one clergy person attributed that difficulty to the itinerant system. “My wife’s job changes so much with the moves that we can never get more than two weeks off,” he said.

Misunderstandings and conflict in the church were listed as major sources of stress. “Can we help the laity to understand United Methodist doctrine so that we don’t have so much conflict about beliefs in the church?” one clergy person wrote.

Single clergy and clergy couples also expressed concern that their unique situations are sometimes misunderstood by peers and leaders.

In addition to listing praises and concerns, clergy also offered the Healing House team suggestions on the care they would like to receive. Several asked for mentoring by older couples or advice on how to start a covenant group. Others asked for a course for new minister’s wives and marriage enrichment.

For more information on the evaluation or the Healing House Team contact Trudy Rankin at trudrank@att.net

   


Top of this page

© 2002 Florida United Methodist Review Online