FL Review Online

General Board of Global Ministries

UM Information

UM Reporter

Florida Southern College


Bethune
Cookman College


FL UM Children's Home




  

October 11, 2002

Edition

Bishop's Corner

National Security Strategy

By Bishop Timothy W. Whitaker

On Sept. 20, 2002 the United States administration announced a new policy known as the National Security Strategy. It endorses a preemptive attack by the United States on another country in order to protect our national security against threats by rogue states and to create a new world order that would provide greater security, democracy and prosperity in the world.

There are three things I notice about the National Security Strategy. First it is new. This is the first time the United States has formally announced a policy of initiating preemptive attacks upon other nations. In the past the Pentagon has provided plans for preemptive attacks, but they have never been used or endorsed as public policy.

Second, the National Security Strategy is aggressive. It replaces the old strategy of deterrence and containment. It is a strategy that might be used against Iraq. Speculation is that it could be used to make demands upon Iran, North Korea or some other nation in the future.

Third, in my opinion, it has a utopian sound. There is a promise of a better future for the whole world that would result from using this strategy either to warn other nations or to invade them if they pose a threat to our security or that of the world.

Christians in America have reason to be disturbed by this new policy. It has never been adopted before, probably because no one would dare propose such a foolish and dangerous strategy. A few Christians oppose all war. Others endorse only strategies of non-violence. Many Christians acknowledge that, tragically, war is necessary in extreme circumstances as a last resort or as the only way to restrain evil and protect innocent people.

I cannot comprehend how any Christian could endorse a policy of preemptive strikes against another nation where there are options of deterrence and containment. And Christians are wary of all utopian visions of creating complete security through the clever plans of human beings because we understand that there will also be mistakes, tragedies and dangers in history until Jesus Christ comes again to judge the living and the dead.

War is no mere “political issue.” It is a human behavior that is weighed with the heaviest moral gravity. This new strategy deserves the scrutiny of everyone, especially those of us who seek to follow the Prince of Peace. I myself must say no in the name of Jesus Christ to the National Security Strategy.


Top of this page

© 2002 Florida United Methodist Review Online